Marcos Gil Trigo

DLA Piper


COMPETENZE

MF Italian Legal Ranking 2024

Practice AreaBanda
No data available in table
Practice AreaBanda
Showing 0 to 0 of 0 entries

MF Italian Legal Ranking 2023

Practice Area Banda
Practice Area Banda

Legal Ranking City Edition

Practice Area - Macro Regione Banda
Practice Area - Macro Regione Banda

ULTIME OPERAZIONI ANALIZZATE


RELAZIONI

Clienti Assistiti

The chart shows a balanced list of the Marcos Gil Trigo's client portfolio - based on PBV Monitor's Analyzed Transactions during last Twelve Mounths
SantanderKimberly-Clark CorporationGKN Automotive05K10KRevenue (ML. Euro)

Professionisti Attivi

The chart shows a balanced list of counselor working with Marcos Gil Trigo - based on PBV Monitor's analyzed transactions during last Twelve Mounths
Natasha Luther-JonesMarta ClementeHayley KinseyVíctor SanjuanTom MetcalfeRodrigo Iglesias GamellaRiccardo MalavoltiRebekah BirrellPablo GamboaPablo EcheniqueMarta VizcaínoMariano Renedo LagunaLuis VillasmilJosé María Barrios GarridoJosé MarcoGiuseppe MeleGiulio MaroncelliFelipe López SánchezCarlos Tobias FiguerolaCarlos Fuerte JiménezCarlos Daza Sanromá0150300Agg. deal value (ML. Euro)

Co-Counsel

The Chart shows a balanced list of Marcos Gil Trigo's Co-Counsel Law Firm - based on PBV Monitor's analyzed transactions during last Twelve Mounths

Controparti

The Chart shows a balanced list of Marcos Gil Trigo's other Firms involved - based on PBV Monitor's analyzed transactions during last Twelve Mounths
MF - I ranking di Class Editori | Best of

Client Reviews

The Client Reviews provides a qualitative rating based on Partners' Clients feedback assessment


Communication Skills

0255075100Below expectationMeet expectationExceed expectation0

Technical skills

0255075100Below expectationMeet expectationExceed expectation0

Efficiency

0255075100Below expectationMeet expectationExceed expectation0


Effectiveness

0255075100Below expectationMeet expectationExceed expectation0



Perceived Added Value

0255075100

Peer Reviews

The Peer Reviews provides a qualitative rating based on Counterparts / Referees' feedback assessment


0%20%40%60%80%100%Communication SkillsTechnical skillsEfficiencyEffectivenessPerceived Added Value